Bright Knowledge

Religious beliefs and manslaughter

Wig

Momentous cases that changed the way we live- R v Blaue (1957).

A court ruled that a defendant could not be acquitted for blaming his victim’s fate on their belief system.

In 1957, Robert Blaue stabbed a woman, who was taken to hospital requiring an urgent blood transfusion. The victim was a Jehovah’s Witness, who refused the transfusion because of her religious beliefs.

She later died. At Teesside crown court, Mr Blaue attempted to appeal against his conviction for manslaughter stating that his victim would have survived had she accepted the blood transfusion.

He believed her refusal broke the chain of causation. The court, however, disagreed, dismissing his appeal and stating that those who inflict violence must take their victims as they find them.

Related links

Read about more Momentous cases that changed the way we live

Rate this article

Current rating: $articleHandle.ratingString Stars

Any comments?





47A0D


Fun ideas for charity fundraising

Raising money for charity is a really good and rewarding way to spend your holidays, but it doesn’t have to involve shaking collecting tins in people’s faces. Read on for some top tips to put the ‘fun’ into fundraising.

Read full article

Exploding star simulated in 3D

If you think the new wave of 3D films, TVs and videogames are exciting, imagine watching a star explode in 3D.

Read full article

© BrightsideUNIAID 2003-2010